Exemplary works of art. In the catalogue of the Reference series, items marked 'M' are drawings "by my own Hand" (by Ruskin), P are photographs, E engravings and A by Ruskin's Assistant, Arthur Burgess.
I have placed the following six examples together in order to mark clearly the character of the architecture, whatever its date or country, which depends chiefly for its effect on the sculpture or colouring of surfaces, as opposed to that which depends on construction or proportion of forms. Both these schools have their own peculiar powers; and neither of them are to be praised, or blamed, for the principle they maintain, but only for their wise or unwise manner of maintaining it. The buildings in which the walls are treated as pages of manuscript are good when what is written upon them is rational, and bad when it is foolish; and, similarly, buildings whose structure is their principal merit, are good when they are strong and delicately adjusted, and bad when they are weak and ungraceful.
(Mr. Burgess’s drawing in the first recess is an enlargement of a portion of this photograph. It of the last spandril but one in the lowest row of arches on the left of the central porch. )
(These had to be drawn while holding on with one hand to the horse’s neck, or the rider’s saddle, for the ledge is too narrow to stand upright on; but the leaf pattern of the horse-cloth is carefully given.) And the other details are not without interest. Compare R 24 and 25.
(I have placed these sketches in the Reference series, because they exhibit some architectural characters which are not seen in photographs, and sometimes present features of the buildings which are now destroyed, or likely soon to be so. The traceries in this view of the Ducal Palace are drawn to scale with care, and cannot he photographed from this point, as the view is taken from the water.)