Unpublished manuscript catalogue for proposed re-organisation of the Rudimentary series.
Presented by John Ruskin to the Ruskin Drawing School (University of Oxford), 1875; transferred from the Ruskin Drawing School to the Ashmolean Museum, c.1949.
Ruskin, John, The Ruskin Art Collection at Oxford: Catalogue of the Rudimentary Series, in the Arrangement of 1873, ed. Robert Hewison (London: Lion and Unicorn Press, 1984), cat. Rudimentary no. 153, RUD.153
Finberg, Alexander J., The History of Turner's Liber Studiorum: With a New Catalogue Raisonné (London: Ernest Benn, 1924), no. 12.II
Ruskin, John, Instructions in Practice of Elementary Drawing, Arranged with Reference to the First Series of Examples in the Drawings Schools of the University of Oxford (n.p., [1872]), cat. Rudimentary no. 153
Ruskin, John, Instructions in the Preliminary Exercises Arranged for the Lower Drawing-School (London: Smith, Elder, 1872), cat. Rudimentary no. 153
Ruskin, John, Instructions in the Preliminary Exercise Arranged For the Lower Drawing-School (London: Spottiswoode, 1873), cat. Rudimentary no. 153
Ruskin, John, ‘Rudimentary Series 1878’, 1878, Oxford, Oxford University Archives, cat. Rudimentary no. 159
Ruskin, John, ‘The Ruskin Art Collection at Oxford: Catalogues, Notes and Instructions’, Edward T. Cook and Alexander Wedderburn, eds, The Works of John Ruskin: Library Edition, 39 (London: George Allen, 1903-1912), 21, cat. Rudimentary no. 159
A study of Flour-mill life, as essential to all other life, given in the extreme of its simplicity from a Kentish Water-mill; the figures (for the second time, with the exception of the dog) being more satisfactory than in the artist’s usual work. I am so fond of the Plate that I have hitherto taken all the parts of it upon trust. I felt, on looking at it just now with a fresh eye, that I could easily spare d the dog out of it, but find on looking longer that I was wrong and that he was needed to prevent our being confined within the four lines of the door. (My friend secures me in embarrassment by asking whether “a decent dog would not have answered the same purpose, adding, most truly, that this is like one of Hogarth’s dogs .)